![]() It has in addition to this snap tool the same align tool as Tinkercad.ġ23D design also has a proper measure tool, much like what you find in Fusion 360, although not as fleshed out. How ’bout some love for the good ol’ Comic Sans? The measure tool shows the shortest length between the two selected edges, the anlge between them and the lengths of the edges themselves. We have to mention the import/export options as well. There are expanded features here compared to Tinkercad with export and import of STEP and SAT-files, which is convenient. ![]() vs Fusion 360īeing more of a simplified Fusion 360 than an improved Tinkercad software, 123D Design can almost get a bit annoying to work with if you’re used to Fusion (or other larger CAD programs, we have to assume). In Tinkercad you’re so blatantly aware of your major limitations that every feature is a godsend, but in 123D Design there are all these smaller and more subtle limitations which you discover after a while which can almost give you a bit of a headache. Let’s talk about the major differences first. In 123D Design you don’t have the render, sculpt or CAM modules (among several others), which you all find in Fusion. The browser is not present in 123D Design where you in Fusion have a good overview and management over each instance (components, bodies, sketches and so on). This is essential to have if your assembly consists of several components and extremely convenient to have regardless of the assembly size. You also don’t have anything close to the “capture history”/parametric modelling feature in 123D Design which you have in Fusion. #123D DESIGN SHELL INVALID OPERATION FREE#.#123D DESIGN SHELL INVALID OPERATION DOWNLOAD#.#123D DESIGN SHELL INVALID OPERATION SOFTWARE#.Even though there are learning curves, quirks, and (somewhat) unique workflows, I strongly feel that the above choices are far better than any similarly priced alternatives (when comparing SolidWorks to other expensive CAD packages, or Fusion 360 to other free CAD softwares). sometimes Fusion 360 still drives me crazy). Once you grasp the concept of going from 2d sketches to 3d models things start to “click” and the programs begin to become very intuitive (SolidWorks specifically. The advantages of either software mentioned above do come with a learning curve. The cloud is how they do things, but files can also be saved locally (albeit in a dumb and clunky way). It’s nowhere near as clean, polished, or linear as SolidWorks, but since almost anyone qualifies for a free license it’s hard to beat. The built in tutorials are superb in helping achieve this, and as you progress through them you’ll understand that the workflow is very linear (in a good way), and that things that at first seem abstract, are instead quite intuitive while being extremely robust.Īlternatively, I think Fusion 360 is the way to go. You have to invest time to understand the interface, and to learn how to go from staring at the screen to ending up with a design of any level of complexity. That said, I think SolidWorks is hands down the best option out there. ![]() Each one has their own learning curves, quirks, and workflows. You’re going to have to redefine your concept of intuitive in regards to CAD software. Non-reddit communities are listed in our getting started guide We welcome community contributions to this wiki! Related Communities ![]() Hit the report button or message the mods NEED HELP? WE HAVE A WIKI! First layer posts and spaghetti posts are now to only be posted on First layer Fridays and Spaghetti Saturdays respectively.Use the Stickied Purchase Advice Thread.News, information, links, help and fun related to 3D printing, 3D printers, additive manufacturing, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |